Jon,

See Andrew Gelman’s paper with Kink and Liu on imputation of questions not 
asked and my discussion of it.  It has some connection.  David Meyer (now 
president of AIR) also did some related work back in the late 80s (as I recall) 
on imputing scores on college entrance exams for people who opted not to take 
the exams.

--Dave


Judkins, D. R. (1998).  Comment on “Not asked and not answered: Multiple 
Imputation for multiple surveys,” an article by Gelman, King and Liu.  Journal 
of the American Statistical Association, 93, 861-864.


From: Impute -- Imputations in Data Analysis 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jonathan Mohr
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 4:09 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Papers on treatment of "not applicable" responses?

Hi folks,
This question is not specifically related to multiple imputation, but I thought 
folks might have suggested readings from the missing data literature on 
treatment of "not applicable" responses. For example, some measures have 
respondents rate characteristics of relationships with various family members, 
and items might be left blank if the respondent did not grow up with--for 
example--a father. On the one hand, it seems odd to treat such responses as 
missing (and apply modern missing data techniques to them). On the other hand, 
if such items are believed to be indicators of a larger construct (e.g., 
conflictual family relationships), then it seems as though it might be okay to 
treat N/A responses as missing.

I haven't seen this issue addressed much in published papers, but I thought I'd 
see if I may have missed something. I'd be interested in any leads people can 
share.
Thanks,
Jon

--
***Please note change of email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>***

Jonathan Mohr
Assistant Professor
Department of Psychology
Biology-Psychology Building
University of Maryland
College Park, MD 20742-4411

Office phone: 301-405-5907
Fax: 301-314-5966
Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>


________________________________
This message may contain privileged and confidential information intended 
solely for the addressee. Please do not read, disseminate or copy it unless you 
are the intended recipient. If this message has been received in error, we 
kindly ask that you notify the sender immediately by return email and delete 
all copies of the message from your system.

Reply via email to