> every mailserver i've ever installed also has a dns server on it, > so i don't think it's going to be a traffic problem?
The problem is the traffic it would cause on the sender's DNS server. All of the proposals impact the sender domain's DNS server in some fashion. Some people believe that "shifting bandwidth costs" back to the sender in this fashion is wrong. Personally, I think the idea of senders paying more to send mail is a good thing. How much of a cost, on the other hand, is something that needs determining, hence this survey. > would this work? > (i use this, to create this: http://216.173.223.10/ > <B0011370251>[10/06/03:15:56:01][2800][133]<aquaterra-list-req > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>[1]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> So I'm looking at the message ID, date and time, size, (what's the 133?), MAIL FROM and RCPT TO? To this I also need added the source IP and the HELO or EHLO hostname, which are normally available in the SMTPRS log. -- PGP key (0x0AFA039E): <http://www.pan-am.ca/[EMAIL PROTECTED]> What's a PGP Key? See <http://www.pan-am.ca/free.html> GOD BLESS AMER, er, THE INTERNET. <http://vmyths.com/rant.cfm?id=401&page=4> This is the discussion list for the IMS Free email server software. To unsubscribe send mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered by Rockliffe MailSite http://www.rockliffe.com/mailsite Rock Solid Software (tm)
