Sure, anything I can do to help. I will followup on the AC thread
Thanks,
Gorkem
On 1 Apr 2018, at 14:28, Mike Milinkovich wrote:
On 2018-04-01 1:59 PM, Gunnar Wagenknecht wrote:
I have been an active committer/lead on Eclipse projects since 2004
and the way eclipse projects are
supposed to be run has not changed too much since then. You can
compare 2008 EDP [3] and see for yourself.
And every time a project tries to adopt practices that is different
from EDP, we end up with a discussion
around how to patch the day to day practice and do very little on
EDP itself.
I agree, that last larger revision to the EDP is quite some time ago.
However, we spent quite some time reviewing and discussing it at the
AC. I believe back then a significant change was the elimination of
sub-projects to simplify organization. It's about time to look at a
new major revision, which will happen. It's not an easy thing,
though. Someone has to do the work and I believe that the EF folks
are pretty hands down with the EE4J on boarding. This the AC's role
to provide input to and define the EDP becomes more important.
Looking forward to your input to that! :)
Gorkem,
I would like to echo what Gunnar says here. It's time to do another
significant overhaul of the Eclipse Development Process. So please
help contribute to that.
--
Mike Milinkovich
mike.milinkov...@eclipse-foundation.org
(m) +1.613.220.3223
_______________________________________________
incubation mailing list
incubation@eclipse.org
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation
_______________________________________________
incubation mailing list
incubation@eclipse.org
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation
