Leslie Daigle wrote: > > We've already done a pretty wide sweep to get interested non-IETF > parties to this list, and used the plenary presentation to encourage > people there to follow up on this list. > > I.e.: this list is the place, and now is when we need to be > getting this document together. > > Looking to the future, I could see doing similar presentations > in other fora that are demonstrated to have interest and > involvement in the independent series, and similarly guiding > them to a public mailing list for discussion.
IMO, this is the time, and I've already suggested places below for similar presentations. I would hope that we would involve those communities just as much as we proceed with this document. Joe > Leslie. > > Joe Touch wrote: >> >> Olaf M. Kolkman wrote: >>> Kind Colleagues, >>> >>> After the IAB plenary discussion the open issues concerning the >>> independent stream were presented[1]. >> >> Is there any consideration to presenting these issues in other forums, >> e.g., at ACM Sigcomm, or IEEE ICNP - where non-IETF community members >> might be encouraged to provide input? >> >> Joe >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> INDEPENDENT mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/independent
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ INDEPENDENT mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/independent
