*> *> One additional tuning suggestion. If we are going to move *> toward posting a notice that a document has gone into RFC Editor *> review as an independent submission somewhere, I think we should *> allow the IESG to notify the RFC Editor that _they_ are *> initiating that review as well. If they never take advantage of *> it, nothing is lost. But, again in the interest of efficiency *> and flexibility, if an AD happens to notice a document headed *> down the "independent" path that seems problematic, in the *> spirit of this exchange I don't see any reason to prevent the *> IESG from initiating the review if they think that is *> appropriate. *> *> john *>
Not unreasonable, although the program begins to get rather obscure with locks and signals! ;-) The information that a given draft is in RFC Editor review as an independent submission is of course always available in the RFC Editor quueue, but I suppose there could be a display that shows the time derivative of the queue. Boib _______________________________________________ INDEPENDENT mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/independent
