Paul Hoffman wrote: ... > Sam's concerns should indeed be addressed in this document. Formalizing > how the IANA deals with the IESG on new registries and changes to > existing registries has caused a significant reduction in the number of > muffed IANA registries. Independent submission RFCs making additions to > IANA registries whose elements are "RFC required" are important to the > IETF.
I agree with Sam's concerns, but don't think this should be resolved in here. This document might just highlight the concern and suggest that it be handled in an update to the IANA process description. Joe -- ---------------------------------------- Joe Touch Sr. Network Engineer, USAF TSAT Space Segment
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ INDEPENDENT mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/independent
