The issue is here: > particular Internet Draft for publication. The process is described > in more detail in [RFC2223] and a working draft of an update to it > [RFC2223bis].
Since [RFC2223bis] is a normative reference, this means that the draft as is could not be published as an RFC until after [RFC2223bis] appears as an RFC. If this is the intent, then I think the sentence should be changed to: > particular Internet Draft for publication. The process is described > in more detail in [RFC2223bis]. If it is not the intent, then I think the sentence should be changed to: > particular Internet Draft for publication. The process is described > in more detail in [RFC2223] and its successors. -Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: Leslie Daigle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 2:47 PM > To: Dave Thaler > Cc: [email protected]; IAB > Subject: Re: Preview of draft-iab-rfc-independent-00.txt > > > I'll let Olaf comment on most of these issues, but > wanted to respond to one: > > Dave Thaler wrote: > > 3) There is a normative reference to an Internet Draft dated August 2004 > > (rfc2223bis). I would propose removing the reference to that draft, and > > just referencing RFC 2223. (The RFC Editor will of course update > > the reference during publication to the most recent RFC at that time.) > > > > I searched for instances of 2223 in the document, and believe > the current text is fine. (I wasn't clear, from the above, whether > you thought it was okay as is, or wanted to do further surgery). > > The issue with 2223bis is that it a) is significantly different than > RFC2223, b) has been languishing for quite a while (a lot longer than > since 2004) and c) has nevertheless been a guiding document in spite > of its status. > > So, I don't believe you can just drop mention of it. The current > text refers to RFC2223 and its successors, and that seems about > right. > > > Leslie. _______________________________________________ INDEPENDENT mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/independent
