Ian Murdock wrote:
Eric Boutilier wrote:
1. You are correct, binary distributions matter the most, by far.
And your point is?
I repeat: That's why we need OpenSolaris to be a binary distribution.
Why? I fail to see why the former leads to the latter.
Ubuntu has arguably built itself into a great platform without calling
itself Debian, or Linux.
Why does Indiana need to call itself OpenSolaris?
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
