On 7/2/07, Alberto Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I haven't sugested copying. But Indiana is an opportunity to fix things, and > in my opinion, the current package names used, it's something that should be > fixed for the sake of usability.
I disagree. Not only does it break compatibility, it does so for no good purpose. My experience with Linux was that descriptive names didn't enhance usability. There are far more important problems to fix in Solaris/OpenSolaris than package names. (Like what packages exist and what software they contain.) One thing that hasn't been addressed is whether Indiana can use the SUNW package prefix in the first place? -- -Peter Tribble http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
