On Aug 9, 2007, at 7:15 AM, I. Szczesniak wrote: > > Shell performance is relevant. > It matters if the wrapper script for Firefox or Starofffice needs 0.2
Of course, those scripts can and should specify the shell ... so it can be any shell desired. Similarly for the other performance arguments. Don't get me wrong, I like ksh. It's been my solaris shell since ... well before Solaris ;> The question isn't what's good, but what is now the de facto standard. My efforts at sampling show nearly 100% bash in the target markets. I prefer de jure standards, but I don't allow my preferences to cloud my judgement about what is helpful in gaining momentum. Keith H. Bierman [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Strategic Engagement Team | AIM: kbiermank | <speaking for myself, not Sun*> Copyright 2007 _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
