On 05/11/2007, Gary Gendel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Again, thanks for the response. I just thought it my duty to voice my > concerns because Indiana is currently a prototype which offers the most > flexibility to change. There are too many times in a project where > things come to light too late down the path. Even if nothing is done, > at least people will be aware of the issues so they won't be caught > broadsided. That would give a bad light on all the hard work that is > being done.
Certainly; please don't take my comments as an attempt to dissuade you from providing the feedback you have in a constructive manner. -- Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/ "We don't have enough parallel universes to allow all uses of all junction types--in the absence of quantum computing the combinatorics are not in our favor..." --Larry Wall _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
