My desktop computing requirements are a little more modest.
I develop Java apps for my company.
So I need Java, nfs, and smb (cifs).

Java, I think is there.
NFS is there.
SMB is kinda there, but I'd like to mount it via fstab (or the Solaris 
equivalent)

The thing I love most about developing in *nix environments is that the 
tools don't care if the filesystems are local are remote.  SMB on 
Solaris (last time I checked) makes me care :(

-Bryan


Giacomo Tufano wrote:
> Il giorno 21/feb/08, alle ore 18:35, Brian Nitz ha scritto:
>> Giacomo Tufano wrote:
>>> Il giorno 21/feb/08, alle ore 17:22, Brian Nitz ha scritto:
>>>> Rather than focusing on how difficult it is to run dodgey,
>>>> unlicensed
>>>> video codecs out of the box as compared to Ubuntu, I'd like to make
>>> You're right, but for me at home (and, probably, for many people in
>>> Europe) it is legal to download the "dodgey, unlicensed video codec"
>>> for Ubuntu. The repository warns me that this could not be legal in
>>> my
>>> country and this is all. I can legally use DVD, MPEG2 and whatever
>>> for
>>> Ubuntu (legally, in my country) and I cannot with Solaris. The key,
>>> IMHO, is to make sure it is an "user choice" to download and use
>>> "potentially illegal" codecs.
>>>
>> You bring up a good point on perception as this question comes up very
>> often (even from people who also work for U.S. companies).  Maybe the
>> first step is education.  What do you think about this:
>>
>> - For multimedia formats for which there is a completely legal and
>> free
>> option available on OpenSolaris (e.g. Ogg), have the appropriate
>> plug-ins pre-installed so it just works.
>>
>> - For multimedia formats for which there is a legal option available
>> which is not free and therefore must be installed by the end user,
>> register the mime type to bring up codeina or easy-codec-install
>> just as
>> Ubuntu does.  That way, when the user clicks on the file type it
>> presents the option to install the codec.
>>
>> - For multimedia formats for which neither free nor legal options are
>> available on OpenSolaris, bring up an informative dialog:
>>
>> The file you've selected is encoded in a multimedia format which
>> requires a licensed codec in some locales.  It appears that licensed
>> codecs for this format do not exist for OpenSolaris.  Please contact
>> vendor (Y) and ask them to port their codec to OpenSolaris and/or
>> provide a way to legally play your content on your platform of choice.
>> If you find a licensed codec which is not integrated, please inform
>> the
>> OpenSolaris community at [EMAIL PROTECTED]  If you are unable
>> to
>> find a licensed codec and you've researched the relevant laws of your
>> locale, you may be able to find an unsupported content player on
>> GOOGLE
>> and use it at your own risk.   Neither Sun Microsystems nor the
>> OpenSolaris community are responsible for any legal costs associated
>> with the use or misuse of multimedia codecs and related utilities.
> 
> This will be definitely a viable solution for the distribution to be
> "as user friendly as possible". Will probably also solve the flow of
> questions in the aliases and the forums.
> 
> The point (and your proposal do it) is to make clear that there is a
> *potential* legal problem. At the moment what users think is: "Solaris
> is not able to play my video/music, what can I expect from it". I've
> heard this comment countless times, from almost any user (technical
> savvy ones, not Joe Sixpacks-kind). This problem hurts Opensolaris
> perception more than anything else in my experience.
> 
> The problem is big also in reality. I found myself not able to play
> mp3 (not obscure video codecs, mp3 music!). I solved it downloading a
> free (as in beer) codec from a German company and I recompile mplayer
> once in a while, but I'm not the 'typical user' that is trying a new
> distribution. We should not expect people to be able/willing to
> compile things *to be on par with other FOSS distro*, and not to
> create something new and shiny.
> 
> Again, my opinion for what it worth (of course),
> gt
> 
> _______________________________________________
> indiana-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss

Reply via email to