On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 4:20 AM, Danek Duvall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 04:13:38AM +0000, Dennis Clarke wrote: > >> So there you have it ... it did exactly what it should and I didn't >> see a single problem. > > Yup, same for me.
OKay, two successful tests. Is there a way to collect success or failure data or would that constitute a privacy invasion? Would be nice if at the end of a success that the pkg software could fetch a url like pkg.opensolaris.org/success_SUNWipkg_$version$ or similar. Same for a failure. I'm just thinking out loud here. >> so gee ... now what ? reboot I guess ? > > Follow the release notes. Upgrading through build ... 88? 89? you have to > use the new update_grub: all the way from os200805 on the CDROM to the latest. Why even use the snv_xx numbers anymore? Can OpenSolaris stand on its own two feet and just be os200805 or os200807 etc ? > pfexec mount -F zfs rpool/ROOT/opensolaris-1 /mnt > pfexec /mnt/boot/solaris/bin/update_grub -R /mnt > > See > > http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/indiana-discuss/2008-June/007094.html Thank you for the heads up .. I'll look into that carefully. Dennis _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
