[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >> If those don't match, then we have a verify bug.
> >
> >Indeed, they differ.
>
> Does "pkg verify -f" report an error though?
Yes:
$ pkg verify SUNWfirefox
$ pkg verify -f SUNWfirefox
PACKAGE STATUS
pkg:/SUNWfirefox ERROR
file: usr/lib/firefox/libxul.so
Unexpected Exception: failed to load dynamic section
I hadn't noticed the -f to verify; seems unintuitive that it needs
a flag to do what one would think 'verify' does. Looks like verify
without -f doesn't do much if it fails to detect truncated files.
Anyway, interactive use aside (where aparte from the unintuitiveness I
don't really mind one way or the other), I guess the real bug here is
that install/image-update needs to be calling the code which does
verify -f in order to avoid silently delivering corrupt files onto disk.
--
Jyri J. Virkki - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun Microsystems
_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
