On 15 Aug 2008, at 15:15, Dave Miner wrote: > How big/hi-res are we talking about to need 72x72? It's a meg, > after all.
Well, on my 24", 1920x1200, 96dpi display here, the 72x72 icons are (not surprisingly) 3/4" wide and high[1]. That's bigger than our default icon size, but they don't look huge on a 24" display by any means. I can certainly imagine some people using that size for desktop or file manager icons, on a 24" or 30" display. Of course, if we don't ship the 72x72 size, the 48x48s will just be scaled up as required. So I agree it's not necessary to ship them, if it helps-- I'd maybe have pushed a bit harder to include the 64x64s if we had any of those, but we don't :) Cheeri, Calum. [1] That's 15mm, to us European types... -- CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer Sun Microsystems Ireland mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GNOME Desktop Team http://blogs.sun.com/calum +353 1 819 9771 Any opinions are personal and not necessarily those of Sun Microsystems _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
