On 10/31/08 13:33, Tim Foster wrote: > Hi all, > > Luca over on zfs-discuss@ posted this just now: > http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/2008-October/052310.html > which suggested that the zfssnap role introduced by > 6750041 Need zfssnap role account for LSARC/2008/571
I reply only into indiana-discuss... > wasn't getting added to his system after doing a pkg image-update to > nv_101a. I'm just going to try to reproduce this myself, but then > realised I already had that role on my system (!) this is my roles: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/security# grep zfs * auth_attr:solaris.smf.manage.zfs-auto-snapshot:::Manage the ZFS Automatic Snapshot Service:: exec_attr:ZFS File System Management:solaris:cmd:::/sbin/zfs:euid=0 exec_attr:ZFS Storage Management:solaris:cmd:::/usr/lib/zfs/availdevs:uid=0 if you need more info about my system tell me! PS: remember that I have installed SUNWzfs-auto-snapshot and and SUNWgnome-time-slider *after* snv_100 update! -- Luca Morettoni <luca(AT)morettoni(DOT)net> - http://morettoni.net BLOG @ http://morettoni.blogspot.com/ | GPG key 0xD69411BB jugUmbria founder - https://jugUmbria.dev.java.net/ | Thawte notary ITL-OSUG leader - http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/itl-osug/ _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
