>But please believe me that it does not look convincing if Sun is not willing >to replace an abiguous wording.
But what if their lawyers say there's nothing ambiguous in the wording? (And, of course, we first need to tak to our lawyers, they need to agree and they would need to redraft the SCA, etc. It's not a simple process so if it is possible, we'd prefer to avoid changing it. Casper _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
