Some time ago I tested vlan in snv_109, which does not work, and was pointed to bug 6810953, which should be fixed in snv_111. And it did (vlan works in dom0). But I think I have a new bug. Here's my network setup
# dladm show-link LINK CLASS MTU STATE OVER eth1 phys 1500 up -- eth0 phys 1500 up -- br102 vlan 1500 up bond0 bond0 aggr 1500 up eth1 br128 vlan 1500 up bond0 putting "br102" as bridge device in Xen config file does not work (Error: Device 0 (vif) could not be connected. Backend device not found.). Putting "bond0" (the trunk) as bridge (that is, vlan is managed inside domU) enables domU to start, but networking does not work. Back in snv_98, at least it worked if I pass the trunk to domU and do vlan inside domU. Is this a known bug? Regards, Fajar _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
