On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 03:48:25PM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote: >> Perhaps, but it does match the way dependencies work. It makes a lot of >> sense to me -- "install a 1.0 product, but if it's been patched up to ..4, >> then install that". Like "pkg install [email protected]" gives you [email protected]. >> Why not? We've talked about version syntax that would force an exact >> match, but in this case, it could simply be a flag to pkg install. > > That would be fine too. Perhaps the exact match case is to start with > pkg:/ instead of adding a flag?
That doesn't feel right to me, but if you can provide arguments for that, I'd be happy to consider them. Danek _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
