Paul Gress wrote:
Viktor Cemasko wrote:
Greetings,
On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 21:02:31 +0200, Uros Nedic <[email protected]> wrote:
I'm really curious why Opera 10 is based on Qt 3.x
when the newest branch is 4.x? Or it is only in my case?
first sorry for my english.
How many people using OpenSolaris? And Opera on it?
Sadly, but this is the answer to your question.
Linux has no such problem:
ftp://ftp.opera.com/pub/opera/linux/1000/final/en/i386/
ftp://ftp.opera.com/pub/opera/linux/1000/final/en/x86_64/
Have a nice day!
I have Opera running on SXCE 121 no problem. I've always had problems
with the package version. Use the "static" and "tarred" version.
ftp://ftp.opera.com/pub/opera/unix/solaris/1000/en/intel/
ftp://ftp.opera.com/pub/opera/unix/solaris/1000/en/sparc/static/
I would expect the tarball and the package to contain the same bits, but
perhaps not. I will have to compare them later. I got slightly further
with the tarball, but it still dumps core.
opensolaris% mdb core
Loading modules: [ libuutil.so.1 ld.so.1 ]
> $c
libX11.so.4`_XRegisterFilterByType+0x54(93d3f00, 0, 21, 21, fdbc0390,
8e7aab0)
xiiimp.so.2`RegisterVKBFilter+0x33(8e7aab0, 80469c0, 0, fdbbfa41)
xiiimp.so.2`IMChangeFocus+0x62(8e7aab0, 0, 0, fdbd0764)
xiiimp.so.2`vkb_target_filter+0x3d(8e611a8, 4600004, 80469c0, 8e7aab0)
libX11.so.4`XFilterEvent+0xdd(80469c0, 0, 80468b8, 898cbd1)
0x898c199(8e61150, 80469c0, 8046a38, 8b1a9f5)
0x8b1aa74(8e87278, 4, 0, 8046c20)
0x89dc30f(8e87278, 0, 8046a98, fe3aac32, 8f0eb90, 8046b30)
0x89dc278(8e87278, 0, 8046a98, 89ceecf)
0x89ceed8(8e61150, 92e3828, 8, fe811e52, 8046b80, 8046b30)
0x8643141(92d9100, 8f0eba4, 1, 8051938)
0x8052591(1, 80476e0, 80476bc, 804f9ba)
0x804fa26(1, 80476e0, 80476e8)
0x804f850(1, 8047828, 0, 8047849, 804786c, 8047885)
> $q
opensolaris%
-Norm
_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
