------------------------------

*July-August **2008
*Year 15    No.133
*Maharashtra*
------------------------------

Related Stories Blast after Blast - Who is responsible?
<http://www.sabrang.com/cc/archive/2008/july-aug08/cover1.html> 'Hindu
bombs' and 'Muslim bombs'
<http://www.sabrang.com/cc/archive/2008/july-aug08/hindumuslimbomb.html>
  Punishment for terrorist
activities<http://www.sabrang.com/cc/archive/2008/july-aug08/punishment.html>
The
Bhonsala School<http://www.sabrang.com/cc/archive/2008/july-aug08/bhonsala.html>
 Nanded accused indict
themselves<http://www.sabrang.com/cc/archive/2008/july-aug08/nandedacc.html>
 An accident too
many<http://www.sabrang.com/cc/archive/2008/july-aug08/accitoomany.html>
   Sequel of terror
<http://www.sabrang.com/cc/archive/2008/july-aug08/sequelterror.html>
Bloodstains<http://www.sabrang.com/cc/archive/2008/july-aug08/bloodstains.html>
  Gujarat blasts: Case
closed?<http://www.sabrang.com/cc/archive/2008/july-aug08/gujarat.html>
     *

'Hindu bombs' and 'Muslim bombs'

In May 2006 Communalism Combat had interviewed the then chief of
Maharashtra's Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS), KP Raghuvanshi. The text of the
full interview was published in CC in June 2006. Reproduced here are
excerpts from the interview:
**

Q: There have been two recent incidents of alleged terrorism (in the state):
in April (2006) when youth manufacturing bombs at Nanded died as a bomb
exploded unexpectedly and the attempt on the RSS headquarters at Nagpur in
May. How do you view these incidents?

A:* Unfortunately, one (Nanded incident) is a terrorist act by Hindus and
the other (Nagpur incident) by Muslims trained in Pakistan.

*

Q: The administration is perceived to be tight-lipped about the Nanded
incident while speaking repeatedly of Nagpur, Malegaon and Aurangabad (the
arms haul). Is there any policy decision behind this selective treatment?

A:* Both incidents are being handled with the same vigour. Both are serious.
In the Nanded case the very fact that the investigation has been handed over
to us, the ATS, shows how the administration and government are viewing it.
Investigations are on. Two persons making the bombs died on the spot... The
house was the residence of the local Bajrang Dal and VHP activist.

This is the same group of terrorists responsible for the bomb blasts at the
Parbhani mosque in (November) 2003, an incident in which 25 persons were
injured. Until now we do not know for sure if they are linked to the other
masjid bomb blasts at Purna and Jalna (August 2004, in which 18 persons were
injured). Now we are awaiting the go-ahead from the doctor to interrogate
them to get further leads. We have applied the provisions of the Unlawful
Practices Act. It is clear that these bombs were not being manufactured for
a puja*. *They were being manufactured for unlawful ends to wreak violence
through terror. There is no question of going slow on the investigation.

*

Q: Is there a specially worked out drill that is followed by the police for
such 'terrorist operations'? Some serious questions about the Nagpur
incident were raised by a citizens' fact-finding committee. One general
criticism is that the 'terrorists' are often killed and diaries with a long
list of convenient details found?

A:* I accept that there is this general criticism that terrorists captured
in such operations are killed, diaries found, etc. I can only state that for
such operations the police are trained so that if there is firing, they must
shoot to kill.

May I ask you a question? Why are no questions raised by fact-finding teams
about the arms hauls in Malegaon and Aurangabad and the identity of the
accused who have been arrested? The haul is there for all to see. The
accused are alive, not dead. No parents or relatives have cried foul saying
that they are victims of a 'false arrest'. Do you have any idea of the
amount of ammunition hauled? Huge caches of AK-47s – no one can say that
they had been falsely placed there by us! RDX in quantities several times'
larger than what was found and used in the multiple bomb blasts in Mumbai in
1993.

Nanded is a serious development and has frightening repercussions if we
find, through investigations, that this was not an isolated incident but
also part of an organised pattern. But the incident that was foiled in
Nagpur and the arms hauls in Malegaon and Aurangabad – which we see as
distinct and separate transactions – cannot simply be underplayed or
overlooked either.

 ------------------------------
[ Subscribe <http://www.sabrang.com/cc/archive/2008/subscribe.html> | Contact
Us <http://www.sabrang.com/cc/archive/contact.htm> |
Archives<http://www.sabrang.com/cc/archive/2008/archive.htm>|
Khoj <http://www.sabrang.com/cc/archive/khoj/index.html> |
Aman<http://www.sabrang.com/cc/archive/aman/index.htm>]
[ Letter to editor  <http://www.sabrang.com/cc/archive/2008/feedback.htm> ]

Copyrights (c) 2002, Sabrang Communications & Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
------------------------------

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Nor can Goodness and Evil be equal.  Repel (evil) with what is better; then the 
enmity between him and you will become as if it were your friend and intimate!
Visit: sultan.org

Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Post to group: [email protected]
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to