Sir, Thank you, very very much, for helping.
Yesterday, i also thought of *G. pentandra*, but stopped short of. Instead i set it to our group. Bengal Plants has 5 *Pouzolzia*, i copy below - I. Lobes of the male perianth convex or gibbous, on the back - 1) *P. indica* Gaud. : leaves mostly alternate, base cuneate, nerves 1 pair above the basal.... = In most of the provinces - 2) *P. indica* var. *alienata* Wedd. : leaves mostly opposite, base rounded, nerves 1 pair above the basal..... = In all the provinces - 3) *P. auriculata* Wight : leaves all alternate, nerves many, branching; stamens always 5 = Chota Nagpur II. Lobes of male perianth abruptly inflexed about the middle, transversely folded at the flexure, hence the buds truncate; leaves with three simple primary leaves running nearly or quite to leaf apex :- - 4) *P. pentandra* Benn. : stem terminating in a bracteate spike = Orissa, Chota Nagpur (FI informs it can be found about Calcutta) - 5)* P. hirta* Hassk. : stem not running out into a bracteate spike = Chota Nagpur The above is Greek to me! However, Bengal Plants equates *P. indica* Gaud. with *Urtica suffruticosa* of Flora Indica. Flora indica informs (*U. suffruticosa*) :- "Suffruticose, leaves alternate, lanceolate, broadest at the base, entire, three nerved, smooth...... Female calyx one-leaved, with a contracted, bidentate mouth; and the outside deeply ribbed and hairy..." Any chance (pic P1030738.jpg)? Thank you once again. Regards, surajit On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 12:27 PM, D.S Rawat <drdsrawat.alpin...@gmail.com>wrote: > With alternate leaves we have the possibility of *G.pentandra* as per > FoC. Which looks like attached image. I feel your plant is not closer to > G.pentandra; or it is yet not with well developed flowers. > DSRawat Pantnagar > > On Saturday, May 25, 2013 11:43:26 AM UTC+5:30, surajitkoley wrote: >> >> Good morning Sir >> >> Thank you very much for confirming. But, >> FoC<http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=200006407>says >> that the leaves in >> *Gonostegia hirta* (Blume) Miq. are opposite. >> >> Regards, >> >> surajit >> >> >> >> On Saturday, 25 May 2013 10:32:57 UTC+5:30, D.S Rawat wrote: >>> >>> Yes, with changed name *Gonostegia hirta* (Blume) Miq. (=*Pouzolzia >>> hirta* (Blume) Hassk.). >>> DSRawat Pantnagar >>> >>> On Friday, May 24, 2013 10:57:08 PM UTC+5:30, surajitkoley wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/indiantreepix/gN8rKAKPrGE/unsubscribe?hl=en > . > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to indiantreepix@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=en. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to indiantreepix@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
