Subir ji, Tapas ji, Gurcharan ji, Thanks a lot for correction in id. Regards, Aarti
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > I think we should adopt Lysiphyllum hookeri, recognised by GRIN and APNI > The Plant List, as always is a confused database. > It lists both *Lysiphyllum* *hookeri* (F.Muell.) > Pedley<http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl/record/ild-34888> > and *Bauhinia* *hookeri* > F.Muell.<http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl/record/ild-49815> as > accepted names and funny thing is is that under former it lists no synonym, > not even basionym (responsible for M. Muell. author name in combination. > > Dr. Gurcharan Singh > Retired Associate Professor > SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 > Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. > Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 > http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/ > http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ > > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Subir Bandyopadhyay < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> *Lysiphyllum hookeri *(F.Muell.) Pedley is the correct name. Bauhinia >> hookeri F. Muell. is now its synonym. >> Subir Bandyopadhyay. >> >> ----- Forwarded Message ----- >> *From:* Tapas Chakrabarty <[email protected]> >> *To:* Subir Bandyopadhyay <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Friday, December 13, 2013 3:12 PM >> *Subject:* Fwd: [efloraofindia:177244] Re: Bauhinia hookeri : For >> Validation : Lalbagh,Bangalore : 121213 : AK-11 >> >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: *Aarti S. Khale* >> <[email protected]<http://mailto:aarti%[email protected]/> >> > >> Date: Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 9:25 AM >> Subject: [efloraofindia:177244] Re: Bauhinia hookeri : For Validation : >> Lalbagh,Bangalore : 121213 : AK-11 >> To: Raman Arunachalam <[email protected]>, Gurcharan Singh < >> [email protected]> >> Cc: efloraofindia <[email protected]>, Tabish Qureshi < >> [email protected]> >> >> >> Raman ji, >> Thanks again. >> Which is the correct name, and which is the Syn? >> Perhaps Gurcharan ji can explain. >> Regards, >> Aarti >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Raman Arunachalam < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> *Lysiphyllum hookeri, (F. Muell.) Pedley* <=> White Orchid Tree >> >> >> On Dec 12, 2013, at 11:24 AM, Aarti S. Khale <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> The name suggested seems to be wrong. It says Bauhinia alba. >> I went through an earlier post by Raghu ji, where Tabish ji has clarified >> it being Bauhinia hookeri. >> Kindly validate. >> Aarti >> <Bauhinia-P1220298.JPG><Bauhinia-P1220300.JPG><Bauhinia-P1220302.JPG> >> <Bauhinia-P1220303.JPG><Bauhinia-P1220304.JPG> >> >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "efloraofindia" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> >> >> >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
