Dinesh ji Here are some: http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=110&taxon_id=200023542
<http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=110&taxon_id=200023542> http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=12&taxon_id=200023542 <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=12&taxon_id=200023542> http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=620&taxon_id=200023542 <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=620&taxon_id=200023542> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Blainvillea_acmella <http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Blainvillea_acmella> http://www.plantnames.unimelb.edu.au/Sorting/Blainvillea.html <http://www.plantnames.unimelb.edu.au/Sorting/Blainvillea.html> http://www.plantnames.unimelb.edu.au/Sorting/Acmella.html <http://www.plantnames.unimelb.edu.au/Sorting/Acmella.html> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Dinesh Valke <[email protected]>wrote: > Thank you very much, Gurcharan ji. > In the (Online) Digital Dictionaries of South Asia, no mentions of * > Blainvillea* are found; however *S. acmella* are found in some of the > languages, which perhaps refer to *B. acmella*. > > Regards. > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Dinesh ji >> >> Spilanthes acmella is a highly confused species. Recent studies have shown >> that Verbesina acmella L. on which Murray based his combination Spilanthes >> acmella (L.) Murray is now correctly known as Blainvillea acmella (L.) >> Philipson with flat receptacle and white ray florets. The species wrongly >> refered to Spilanthes acmella by several authors including Hayata (1904), >> Kitamura (1941) and Li (1978) refering to many Asian specimens i.e >> Spilanthes acmella auct (non (L) Murray) is correctly known as Acmella >> paniculata (Wall. ex DC) Jensen, 185, which has cone shaped receptacle >> without ray florets. So specimens of Spilanthes acmella in older >> publications should belong to Blainvillea acmella (L.) or Acmella paniculata >> (Wall. ex DC) Jensen, or may be even A. uliginosa with yellow ray florets, >> or possibly others as I had given in the key uploaded earlier. >> >> >> >> -- >> Dr. Gurcharan Singh >> Associate Professor >> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 >> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. >> Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 >> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Dinesh Valke >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Dear friends, >>> >>> Is *Spilanthes acmella* synonym of *Blainvillea acmella* OR are they >>> separate species ? >>> >>> This query because Google image results show them different. >>> >>> *Spilanthes acmella* is treated as synonym of *Blainvillea acmella*. >>> at: >>> eFlora (Nepal Checklist) ... >>> http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=110&taxon_id=200023542 >>> NPGS / GRIN ... >>> http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/taxon.pl?311862 >>> >>> >>> Regards. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "efloraofindia" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> [email protected]<indiantreepix%[email protected]> >>> . >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=en. >>> >> >> >> >> >> > -- Dr. Gurcharan Singh Associate Professor SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=en.
