Thanks Tabish ji for update and sharing the useful paper. Dr. Gurcharan Singh Retired Associate Professor SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/ http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Tabish <tabi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Impatiens badrinathii is the same species as Impatiens chungtienensis (see > the 2015 paper attached). > (meaning, it was incorrectly described as a new species) > So the correct species is: > *Impatiens chungtienensis* Y.L.Chen in *Acta Phytotax. Sin.* 16(2): 40, > 44, fig. 1-2 (1978) > Synonyms: > *Impatiens badrinathii* Pusalkar and Singh in Taiwania 55(1): 13, fig. 1 > A–W (2010) > Impatiens amplexicaulis auct. non Edgew. > > Although it was originally discovered in China, it is also found in the > Himalayas, Eastern to Western. > > I am attaching 3 images of *Impatiens chungtienensis *for comparison. > Cheers! > Tabish > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to indiantreepix@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send an email to indiantreepix@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
