Thanks, Chadwell ji On 29 Mar 2017 3:06 a.m., "[email protected]" < [email protected]> wrote:
> Surely Urtica hyperborea has never been recorded from Tamil Nadu before? > > Sorry Santhan but this plant does not come close to Urtica hyperborea..... > > I am familiar with U.hyperborea from high-altitude passes in Ladakh - > which is thousands > of kms to the north with a completely different climate. > > According to 'Flowers of the Himalaya' this species is distributed from > Pakistan to Bhutan also > Tibet and Mongolia on stony high altitude steppes @ 4100-5100m. > > Stewart gives an altitudinal range for Hunza, Baltistan & Ladakh from > 3600-5200m. > > It is also recorded from E.Tibet North of Sikkim on mountain slopes @ > 5000m. > > An occurrence, albeit in the hills near Ooty, would be extraordinary. > > I have never been to Tamil Nadu and know nothing of its flora. > > I note there are no images of U.hyperborea on eFI. > > On Monday, March 27, 2017 at 2:46:15 PM UTC+1, Santhan P wrote: > >> Urtica, undershrub at 2000m altitude near Doddabetta Nilgiri Tamilnadu >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
