Sorry again. My interpretation seems to be exactly opposite. Is the plant depicted in the picture *G tiliifolia* then? Can somebody please elaborate? BSI Mah flora also says they are foliaceous in G.tiliifolia.
On 26 April 2010 23:12, Satish Phadke <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry for sending bigger size image. > > > On 26 April 2010 23:10, Satish Phadke <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Pursuing the search about the differentiating characters I checked for the >> stipules of the plant today. They are foliaceous in G.asiatica which is >> clearly seen in the attached picture while they are linear lanceolate in >> G.tiliifolia. >> Attaching some pictures showing it and part of the key from Cooke's flora. >> My earlier pictures do not show them clearly. >> I would like to request Prashant ji to show some picture of G.tiliifolia >> with stipules if he has any such picture in his collection. >> The glands near the petals are difficult to recognise from the available >> pictures. >> Regards >> Dr Phadke Satish >> >> >> >> On 15 April 2010 20:33, Satish Phadke <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> This small tree is also flowering on Vetal Tekdi(Pune) at present. >>> I hope the ID is correct. There are many plants in the area some are 6 >>> feet while the largest are 12-15 feet high or even may be larger. >>> I was told this same tree by different IDs by many including some >>> botanists,often as Grewia tilifolia and Grewia asiatica. >>> Requesting for correct ID(Of course if possible by looking at the visible >>> characters in the picture) >>> Leaf size biggest noted is 18-20cm. Flower size 1 cm. >>> Dr Phadke Satish >>> >> >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=en.
