I think it appears more like *Artocarpus hirsutus*. The syncarp is spiny whereas in *A.lakoocha* it is smooth velvety. Let us wait for others comments. Recently I have noticed that Almeida's flora appears to be more descriptive and there are certain differences between it and the BSI Mah flora which I have. You must have checked with Almeida's what does it say about the key related to this? Dr Phadke
On 4 May 2010 20:41, rashida atthar <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Saw a fruit in the large tree of Artocarpus lacucha Buch.- Ham.at Aanashi > WLS, Karnataka in the last week of April,'10. > > regards, > Rashida. > > > > ------------------------------ > All the post budget analysis and implications Sign up > now.<http://news.in.msn.com/moneyspecial/budget2010/> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<indiantreepix%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=en.
