Thanks Dinesh Ji. Regards, Aarti On Wednesday, May 1, 2019 at 5:45:23 PM UTC+4, Dinesh Valke wrote: > > I too think it must be *Bridelia retusa*. > Regards. > Dinesh > > On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 7:07 PM Aarti S. Khale <aarti...@gmail.com > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> A small tree seen in a cultivated garden in Nasik. >> Bridelia retusa? >> For validation please. >> Aarti >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "efloraofindia" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to indian...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. >> To post to this group, send email to indian...@googlegroups.com >> <javascript:>. >> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send an email to indiantreepix@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
