Thanks Garg Ji. I had suggested the same earlier. Regards, Aarti On Saturday, February 1, 2020 at 12:38:44 PM UTC+5:30, JM Garg wrote: > > I found the keys on net from A revision of Tecoma Juss. (Bignoniaceae) in > Bolivia > <http://redbiblio.unne.edu.ar/pdf/62_WOOD%202008%20A%20revision%20of%20Tecoma.pdf> > > by JRI Wood (Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2008, 156, 143–172) > as below: > *KEY TO TECOMA SPECIES IN BOLIVIA* > 1. Corolla yellow (sometimes with reddish veins), ventricose above a > shortly cylindrical, strongly demarcated base, ±campanulate in form; > anthers sparsely pilose ......2 > 1a. Corolla red, red and yellow, or orange (very rarely yellow), gradually > widened from the base, ±cylindrical-tubular in form; anthers glabrous > ........3 > 2. Leaves simple; corolla completely glabrous externally ...........1. > *Tecoma > beckii* > 2a. Leaves five- to nine-foliolate; corolla usually with a few hairs, at > least in the sinuses of the lobes .............2. *Tecoma stans* > 3. Corolla regularly five-lobed, uniformly red or reddish-orange (very > rarely yellow); anthers included; leaflets ovate to elliptic, > serrate-dentate ..........4. *Tecoma tenuiflora* > > *KEY TO SUBSPECIS OF TECOMA FULVA* > 1. Leaves hirtellous; leaflets 11–21, broadly obovate, about as broad as > long, mostly < 1 cm long.........a ssp. *fulva* > 1a. *Leaves glabrous or, if hirtellous, the terminal leaflet oblong, > > 1.5 cm long, much longer than broad; leaflets 1–17 *.........2 > 2. *Leaf rhachis clearly winged; lateral leaflets obovate to > oblanceolate, two to three times as long as broad*; corolla regularly > expanded from base, lacking a clearly differentiated basal tube, lobes < 7 > mm long, the dorsal pair not united or united for < 2 mm; stamens at mouth > of corolla, the filaments equal in length .........3 > 2a. Leaf rhachis unwinged or almost so; all leaflets oblong or oblong > lanceolate, broadest near the centre or below, mostly three to five times > as long as broad; corolla with a clearly differentiated basal tube, the > lobes c. 10 mm long, the dorsal pair united for > 2 mm; two outer filaments > longer than the inner pair, their anthers exserted .......5 > 3. Leaflets 13–17, coriaceous; the terminal leaflet only slightly larger > than the laterals, obovate ................b. ssp. *arequipensis* > 3a. *Leaflets 1–9(-11), thin in texture, the terminal leaflet much larger > than the laterals, oblong *..................4 > 4. Leaflets 1–7 (i.e. some leaves simple); branchlets and leaves > hirtellous .................c. ssp. *tanaeciiflora* > 4a.* Leaflets 3–9(-11), the leaves always divided into leaflets; > branchlets and leaves glabrous or almost so *................. d. ssp. > *guarume* > 5. Corolla 5–7 cm long; leaflets conspicuously serrate-dentate, teeth c. > seven per centimetre ...... e. ssp. *altoandina* > 5a. Corolla 4.5–5.5 cm long; leaflets weakly toothed, teeth three to four > per centimetre..................f. ssp. *garrocha* > > It is very difficult to see many details with your very small images. > However, Leaf rachis appears to be winged and I see 7 leaflets. So ssp. > *guarume > *is possible. > Pl. check the above keys in detail. > > It appears close to images of ssp. *guarume *seen at TechieOldFox > <https://techieoldfox.wordpress.com/2016/05/17/tecoma-fulva-ssp-guarume/> and > Flora and fauna website > <https://www.nparks.gov.sg/florafaunaweb/flora/6/6/6684>, but looks > different from those at Kew Database > <https://www.kew.org/science/tropamerica/imagedatabase/large198/cat_single198-94.htm> > . > > > > > > On Fri, 24 Jan 2020 at 21:53, Aarti S. Khale <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> Rakesh Ji, >> You had suggested Tecoma fulva earlier. >> Can it be Tecoma fulva subsp. guarume? >> Regards, >> Aarti >> >> On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 8:12 PM Aarti S. Khale <[email protected] >> <javascript:>> wrote: >> >>> Thanks Rakesh Ji. >>> Regards, >>> Aarti >>> >>> On Sunday, December 22, 2019 at 7:33:19 PM UTC+5:30, dr.rakesh Singh >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> More like Tecoma fulva ... Many cultivars in it . Actually we are not >>>> very clear on Tecoma species beyond T. stans and T. castanifolia . >>>> >>>> On Sun, Dec 22, 2019, 14:28 Aarti S. Khale <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Campsis Species, similar to the one posted by me earlier. >>>>> Campsis radicans was suggested by me. >>>>> This was a small, potted plant. >>>>> Seen yesterday at Lalbagh. >>>>> Aarti >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "efloraofindia" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit >>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAJ6xDqYd%2BeyhPGEm1t9-CxHUP4k2V-Xc2knr_P-5e5eOj7MJ7Q%40mail.gmail.com >>>>> >>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAJ6xDqYd%2BeyhPGEm1t9-CxHUP4k2V-Xc2knr_P-5e5eOj7MJ7Q%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>> . >>>>> >>>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the >>> Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/indiantreepix/k9MHPwCgx1s/unsubscribe. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to >>> [email protected] <javascript:>. >>> To view this discussion on the web, visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/d6b54a53-ee0a-4919-993b-40be2da03e4a%40googlegroups.com >>> >>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/d6b54a53-ee0a-4919-993b-40be2da03e4a%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>> . >>> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "efloraofindia" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> To view this discussion on the web, visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAJ6xDqYyMj3WwsLWPd%3DqBnZ5%3DTMq1SBU9rP-LSFdiSjg3u%3DOFA%40mail.gmail.com >> >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAJ6xDqYyMj3WwsLWPd%3DqBnZ5%3DTMq1SBU9rP-LSFdiSjg3u%3DOFA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> > > > -- > With regards, > J.M.Garg > > 'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna' > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1> > > Winner of Wipro-NFS Sparrow Awards 2014 for efloraofindia > <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/award-for-efloraofindia>. > > For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian Flora, > please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google e-group > <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/indiantreepix> (largest in the > world- more than 3,000 members & 3,00,000 messages on 23.8.18) or > Efloraofindia > website <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/> (with a species > database of more than 13,000 species & 3,00,000 images of which more than > 2,00,000 images are directly displayed on 30.8.19). > > The whole world uses my Image Resource > <http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg> of more than a > thousand species & eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc. > (arranged alphabetically & place-wise). You can also use them for free as > per Creative Commons license attached with each image. > > Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common Birds of > India'. >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/30e59506-7fed-4c17-b4ae-4901b8d8ce39%40googlegroups.com.
