POWO and GBIF has mentioned Cynanchum acidum (Roxb.) Oken and Cynanchum viminale (L.) L. as two different sp. but CoL has treated them as one. I guess one of these two sp. Thank you Saroj Kasaju
On Tuesday, June 2, 2015 at 10:11:02 PM UTC+5:45 Anurag N. Sharma wrote: > That is possible sir. I have looked at it wrongly. > Thank you. > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 8:08 AM, surajit koley <surajitno...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Why not 1 mm Anurag Ji? >> >> Thank you >> Regards >> >> >> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 12:01 AM, Anurag Sharma <anurag...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> *Please read as- I would assume that the* *style* *(in photo....-.* >>> >>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 12:00 AM, Anurag Sharma <anurag...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Thank you for pointing out Gamble's key sir. >>>> And the shape of the corona lobes. >>>> >>>> Since the part outside which is bifid is the stigma, and the ovary is >>>> superior in Apocynaceae, I would assume that the stigma (in photo >>>> WP_20150420_088) Would begin just above 12.3 cm and end at around under >>>> 12.4 cm. the difference would give me roughly .5mm length of style and the >>>> remaining protruding bit- bifid stigma. >>>> >>>> Or have I misunderstood the structure sir? >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Anurag N. Sharma >>> BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year >>> St. Josephs College >>> Bangalore >>> >> >> > > > -- > Anurag N. Sharma > BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year > St. Josephs College > Bangalore > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/f1bfc61b-b65f-4d29-8820-897572305ed5n%40googlegroups.com.
