Dear friends, ... am attempting to dig into this query; but, am afraid will end up with more queries :) Resurfacing this thread for attention of those who are familiar with * Stereospermum* plants.
Regards. On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Rashida Atthar <atthar.rash...@gmail.com>wrote: > Sorry for the delayed response but Kew has separate entry for both of S. > personatum Hassk. Will have to discuss this once Dr. Gurcharan ji is back. > > regards, > Rashida. > > > On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Satish Phadke <drsmpha...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Thanks Gurcharan ji for going into such details. >> We have with us very limited literature for study. >> >> >> On 13 June 2010 07:21, Gurcharan Singh <singh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Rashida ji >>> I am slightly confused. You are writing that "Dr. Almeida's flora has >>> put S. colais (Buch. - Ham ex Dillw.) as the earlier name for S. >>> personatum (Hassk,)" so logically former should be the correct name and not >>> the latter that you have put in your subject line. According to GRIN also S. >>> colais (Buch.-Ham. ex Dillw.) Mabb. is the correct name. There are two >>> things to support it, firstly Mabberly has made his combination in 1978, >>> whereas as Chatterjee made his in 1948, former is more recent. Secondly >>> basionym Bignonia colais (1837) antedates Dipterosperma personatum Hassk. >>> (1842), and hence if the two species are to be treated as synonyms, S. >>> colais is preferred choice as correct name. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh >>> Retired Associate Professor >>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 >>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. >>> Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 >>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ <http://people.du.ac.in/%7Esinghg45/> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Rashida Atthar < >>> atthar.rash...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Prashant ji, Dr. Almeida's flora has put S. colais (Buch. - Ham ex >>>> Dillw.) as the earlier name for S. personatum (Hassk,) Chatterjee. The >>>> caudate leaves and all morphological characteristics of flowers match very >>>> well with this. >>>> >>>> There is one more species S. personatum ( Hassk.) Chatterjee var. >>>> angustifolia (Haines) Santisukh, this one had earliar name S. colais >>>> (Buch.-Ham. ex Dillw.) Mabberley var. angustifolia (Haines). This one we do >>>> not see, the leaflets are acuminate not caudate, and corola is not wooly >>>> at >>>> base. So what we see generally see is S. personatum (Hassk.) Chatterjee. >>>> Hope this clarifies your query. >>>> >>>> regards, >>>> Rashida. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 9:07 PM, Prashant awale <pkaw...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Dear Rashida ji, >>>>> Nice set of photos. These photographs and one uploaded by me tallies >>>>> well. Both has to be same sp. Do u have some comparison between S. >>>>> personatum and S. colais so that ID can be resolved. >>>>> regards >>>>> Prashant >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Rashida Atthar < >>>>> atthar.rash...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Saw the flowering of Stereospermum personatum (Hassk.) Chatterjee at >>>>>> the south end of the national park in Mumbai on 11 June, '10. >>>>>> along with the capsules. >>>>>> >>>>>> regards, >>>>>> Rashida. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "efloraofindia" group. >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to indiantree...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>> indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<indiantreepix%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> >>>>>> . >>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=en. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "efloraofindia" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to indiantree...@googlegroups.com. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<indiantreepix%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> >>>> . >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=en. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "efloraofindia" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to indiantree...@googlegroups.com. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<indiantreepix%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> >>> . >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=en. >>> >> >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > To post to this group, send email to indiantree...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<indiantreepix%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=en. >
