Dear Garg ji, Maybe you are right. However, unless a key is available to separate the subspecies, I would not try to narrow it down to the subspecies level. *Androsace sarmentosa *is generic enough. Tabish
On Saturday, March 26, 2022 at 1:28:49 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > Hi, Tabish ji, > I think your and Thingnam ji's image at Androsace sarmentosa in FOI > <http://www.flowersofindia.net/catalog/slides/Common%20Rock%20Jasmine.html>, > are of *Androsace sarmentosa* subsp. *primuloides* (Duby) R. Govaerts > <https://efloraofindia.com/2016/11/29/androsace-sarmentosa-subsp-primuloides/> > and > not of *Androsace sarmentosa* Wall. > <https://efloraofindia.com/2011/02/05/androsace-sarmentosa/>, as per > images and details herein. > Pl. correct. > -- > With regards, > J.M.Garg > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/f5d1cd11-297f-49a0-969e-a6168076e33fn%40googlegroups.com.
