Should be Cryptocarya, possibly C. amygdalina.

On Thu, 16 Mar 2023, 14:59 J.M. Garg, <jmga...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Forwarding again for Id assistance please.
>
> Some earlier relevant feedback:
> Seems to be Xylosma sp.- from Prabhat ji
> *Xylosma controversa *Clos ?? But leaf margin serration looks different.
> Thank you mr. Das !
>
> Saroj Kasaju
> Yes, looks different as per images at
>
> https://efloraofindia.com/2018/05/12/xylosma-controversa/- from me
> Inflorescence looks like that in Lauraceae, but could not find any match:
>
> https://efloraofindia.com/2011/01/18/lauraceae/- from me
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: Saroj Kasaju <kasajusa...@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2023 at 21:46
> Subject: SK 3698 12 March 2023
> To: efloraindia <indiantreepix@googlegroups.com>, J.M. Garg <
> jmga...@gmail.com>
>
>
>
> *Dear Members,Location: Phulchoki, Lalitpur, NepalDate: 11 March
> 2023Altitude: 1936m.Habitat : Wild *
>
> Thank you.
>
> Saroj Kasaju
>
>
> --
> With regards,
> J.M.Garg
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"eFloraofIndia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAKFjQVQOEoRXQcpqN7TAbmsk7WYviMCn4rFdJrgrpTnvMxaedg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to