Thanks, Tabish ji
--
With regards,
J. M. Garg

On Wed, 13 Sep, 2023, 09:22 Tabish, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Garg ji,
>   Attaching the original resolution pics of the Ligustrum species from
> Manipur that is there on FOI. Although detail of the leaves is missing from
> these pics, the number of veins on the leaves seem to agree with Ligustrum
> confusum:
>    *Ligustrum compactum:  *primary veins 9-15 on each side of midrib
>    *Ligustrum confusum**:  *primary veins 4-6 on each side of midrib
>    Tabish
> -------------------------------------------
> <http://www.flowersofindia.net>www.flowersofindia.net
> The waterhole of flower lovers
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 12:56 AM Tabish <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Thank you Garg ji for pointing out this species - I was not aware of it. 
>> Saroj's
>> images here <https://groups.google.com/g/indiantreepix/c/28wkEG-BuIY>
>> seem to agree perfectly with the description of flowers of Ligustrum
>> compactum at Flora of China
>> <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=200017792> :
>>  *Corolla 3.5-5 mm; tube ca. as long as lobes. Stamens reaching apex of
>> corolla lobes...*
>> In Saroj's images the stamens are really reaching the tip of the petals,
>> and the petals are about as long as the flower-tube.
>> In the flowers of the species under discussion on FOI (which I determined
>> as Ligustrum confusum) the petals are shorter than the flower-tube, and the
>> stamens appear to be shorter than the petals.
>>  Tabish
>> -------------------------------------------
>> <http://www.flowersofindia.net>www.flowersofindia.net
>> The waterhole of flower lovers
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 5:12 PM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, Tabish ji,
>>> There is another species in the area, which we determined as
>>> *L.compactum* as per details at
>>> https://efloraofindia.com/2020/07/03/ligustrum-compactum/
>>> Pl. check FOI images for this also.
>>> I am not able to reach the decision due to lack of details and low res.
>>> images.
>>>
>>> On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 at 08:24, Tabish <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The renaming comes from the attached paper where *Ligustrum nepalense*
>>>> Wall. is an accepted species. *Ligustrum indicum* is a synonym of 
>>>> *Ligustrum
>>>> sinense, *but that does not include specimens found in India. The
>>>> paper mentions that the species found in India are either *Ligustrum
>>>> nepalense* Wall. or *Ligustrum confusum* Decne. *Ligustrum confusum*
>>>> Decne. is distributed in NE India, Nepal, Sikkim, Bhutan, Burma, China
>>>> (Yunnan) and Thailand. The paper says: "To judge from notes with several of
>>>> the specimens, this species often grows on stream and river banks." We 
>>>> found
>>>> it growing wild in Manipur, on a stream side. Looking at images on Flora
>>>> of Bhutan <https://biodiversity.bt/group/uwicer/observation/show/8221>
>>>> and the illustration at FOC
>>>> <http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=4575&flora_id=2>, I
>>>> think the plant on FOI is *Ligustrum confusum.*
>>>>    Tabish
>>>> -------------------------------------------
>>>> www.flowersofindia.net
>>>> The waterhole of flower lovers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 8:52 PM Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwi4656Mkv2AAxXydvUHHeYRDZMQFnoECBsQAQ&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.flowersofindia.net%2Fcatalog%2Fslides%2FIndian%2520Privet.html&usg=AOvVaw12xMrA_nPj4Q-8YeHFmb48&opi=89978449
>>>>>
>>>>> Is it now *Ligustrum sinense *var. *sinense ??*
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>
>>>>> Saroj Kasaju
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> With regards,
>>> J.M.Garg
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"eFloraofIndia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFBsv0kwcM6aFBCS5ya93zudSbCr7UyTm%3D1oYw%2BOUWa7rQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to