Thank you Mr. Garg ! Saroj Kasaju
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 5:09 PM J.M. Garg <jmga...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks, Saroj ji. > Maybe Dr. Wiegleb clarifies further. > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: Saroj Kasaju <kasajusa...@gmail.com> > Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 at 15:06 > Subject: Re: Ranunculus trichophyllus Chaix > To: J.M. Garg <jmga...@gmail.com> > Cc: efloraofindia <indiantreepix@googlegroups.com> > > > Matching elevation is *Ranunculus trichophyllus* Chaixbut I'm not sure . > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 1:20 PM J.M. Garg <jmga...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> A comment as per Ranunculus trichophyllus subsp. trichophyllus >> <https://efloraofindia.com/2015/02/02/ranunculus-trichophyllus/>: >> "...... The plant from Dhorpata needs to be checked for R. himalaicus >> Tamura. Correct taxonomy below: >> >> Ranunculus aquatilis L., Sp. Pl.: 556 (1753). – Type from Europe >> (Netherlands or Sweden). The species is restricted to temperate Europe with >> some extensions to the southern Medterranean and West Asia. Other >> mentionings are based on misidentification. >> = Ranunculus aquaticus Neck., Delic. Gallo-Belg.: 242 (1768). -Type from >> France, may as well be regarded as orthographic variant of R. aquatilis L. >> >> Ranunculus trichophyllus Chaix, Pl. Vapinc.: 31 (1785), nom. cons. prop. >> – Type from France. The species occurs in the northern hemisphere and may >> be on the Australian mainland. Other mentionings are misidentifications. >> ≡ Ranunculus trichophyllus Chaix in Villars, Hist. Pl. Dauph. 1: 335 >> (1786). >> ≡ Batrachium trichophyllum (Chaix) Bosch, Prodr. Fl. Bat.: 7 (1850). – >> Batrachium is no longer being regarded a separate genus but a section of >> Ranunculus. >> = Ranunculus peucedanifolius All., Fl. Pedem. 2: 53 (1785), nom. rej. >> prop. – Type from Italy. >> = Ranunculus aquatilis L. var. diffusus Withering, Arr. Brit. Pl. ed., 3, >> 2: 507 (1796). – Type from Britain. >> – Ranunculus aquatilis L. var. diffusus sensu Whittemore et auct. amer. – >> An ambiguous taxon which contains several species, besides R. trichophyllus >> also R. longirostris Godr., R. subrigidus W.B. Drew, R. codyanus Boivin, >> and may be others. >> >> Ranunculus himalaicus Tamura, J.Geobot. 26(3), 68, 9 (1978); Rajbhabdari >> & Rai, Handb. Fl. Pl, Nepal 1: 420 (2020); Kumar Ghimire et al., Fl. >> Kailash. Sacr. Landscape Nepal 1: 259 (2021). – Type from Nepal. >> G. Wiegleb, 2024" >> >> Thanks a lot, Wiegleb ji. >> >> On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 at 13:01, J.M. Garg <jmga...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> A comment as per Ranunculus trichophyllus subsp. trichophyllus >>> <https://efloraofindia.com/2015/02/02/ranunculus-trichophyllus/>: >>> "...... The plant from Dhorpata needs to be checked for R. himalaicus >>> Tamura. Correct taxonomy below: >>> >>> Ranunculus aquatilis L., Sp. Pl.: 556 (1753). – Type from Europe >>> (Netherlands or Sweden). The species is restricted to temperate Europe with >>> some extensions to the southern Medterranean and West Asia. Other >>> mentionings are based on misidentification. >>> = Ranunculus aquaticus Neck., Delic. Gallo-Belg.: 242 (1768). -Type from >>> France, may as well be regarded as orthographic variant of R. aquatilis L. >>> >>> Ranunculus trichophyllus Chaix, Pl. Vapinc.: 31 (1785), nom. cons. prop. >>> – Type from France. The species occurs in the northern hemisphere and may >>> be on the Australian mainland. Other mentionings are misidentifications. >>> ≡ Ranunculus trichophyllus Chaix in Villars, Hist. Pl. Dauph. 1: 335 >>> (1786). >>> ≡ Batrachium trichophyllum (Chaix) Bosch, Prodr. Fl. Bat.: 7 (1850). – >>> Batrachium is no longer being regarded a separate genus but a section of >>> Ranunculus. >>> = Ranunculus peucedanifolius All., Fl. Pedem. 2: 53 (1785), nom. rej. >>> prop. – Type from Italy. >>> = Ranunculus aquatilis L. var. diffusus Withering, Arr. Brit. Pl. ed., >>> 3, 2: 507 (1796). – Type from Britain. >>> – Ranunculus aquatilis L. var. diffusus sensu Whittemore et auct. amer. >>> – An ambiguous taxon which contains several species, besides R. >>> trichophyllus also R. longirostris Godr., R. subrigidus W.B. Drew, R. >>> codyanus Boivin, and may be others. >>> >>> Ranunculus himalaicus Tamura, J.Geobot. 26(3), 68, 9 (1978); Rajbhabdari >>> & Rai, Handb. Fl. Pl, Nepal 1: 420 (2020); Kumar Ghimire et al., Fl. >>> Kailash. Sacr. Landscape Nepal 1: 259 (2021). – Type from Nepal. >>> G. Wiegleb, 2024" >>> >>> Thanks a lot, Wiegleb ji. >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>> From: Saroj Kasaju <kasajusa...@gmail.com> >>> Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2023 at 16:00 >>> Subject: Ranunculus trichophyllus Chaix >>> To: efloraindia <indiantreepix@googlegroups.com>, J.M. Garg < >>> jmga...@gmail.com> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *Dear Members,Location: Dhorpatan, Baglung, Nepal Date: 31May >>> 2023Elevation: 2900 m.Habit : Wild* >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >>> Saroj Kasaju >>> >>> >>> -- >>> With regards, >>> J.M.Garg >>> >> >> >> -- >> With regards, >> J.M.Garg >> > > > -- > With regards, > J.M.Garg > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "eFloraofIndia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAEf%3DytQxGEh8PUYcNZcQsECTJVKStyyo6hepEXW9Qr6ZDQKC5w%40mail.gmail.com.
