Yes, Sir, thank you very much for updated identification. With regards,
Surajit Koley On Wed, 21 Feb, 2024, 12:44 pm J.M. Garg, <jmga...@gmail.com> wrote: > As flower heads are yellow, it is more likely to be *Blumea lacera* (Burf. > f.) DC. > Pl. see > https://efloraofindia.com/2011/09/08/blumea-lacera/ > > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: surajit koley <surajitnotavaila...@gmail.com> > Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 at 00:52 > Subject: [efloraofindia:149517] Hooghly : Blumea or Blumea like : yellow > To: efloraofindia <indiantreepix@googlegroups.com> > > > This one is also 2 ft. as in my other post ( > https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/indiantreepix/4QIBEiuWmIY > ). > Features are - > > - wild 2 ft. herb beside railway-station > - branched > - bearing yellow heads > - the size of the heads are similar to those other *Blumea* > > The pictures were shot yesterday and today, at the same place. > > Thank you, > > Regards, > surajit > > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > > > -- > With regards, > J.M.Garg > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "eFloraofIndia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAMV_mc2ymN1pMYcPV6%2BsRJWMCAUmSEzZhrGKi1fZGFF%2B%2BGfieA%40mail.gmail.com.
