Yes, not included. If I include all for such a large family, it will become really difficult to even load the page. Even with a good speed, sometimes it becomes really difficult to load the existing page. This I have done for lots of big families.
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 at 11:34, Saroj Kasaju <kasajusa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Mr. Garg, > > Isn't all genera should be included in the family page, isn't it ? It > would have been easy to browse. > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > -- With regards, J.M.Garg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "eFloraofIndia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFAzMQ4QmgG0WH%3Dok0EG9gcrUT5PQU42%2BgVR312Wf_udFw%40mail.gmail.com.
