To me it seems that photo 4 (6317) is from a different species. Photos 1 and 2 are of C.caucasica. Regards Taffazull
On Monday, June 10, 2024 at 11:18:23 AM UTC+5:30 J.M. Garg wrote: > I think it should be *Celtis caucasica* (syn:* Celtis australis* subsp. > *caucasica* (Willd.) C.C.Towns.) as per discussions at Help identify this > Celtis species <https://groups.google.com/g/indiantreepix/c/gXMhldRE3Wo> > POWO <https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:850999-1> > does not give any distribution of *Celtis australis *L.in India. > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: Anil Thakur <aniltha...@gmail.com> > Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 at 00:44 > Subject: [efloraofindia:266216] Celtis australis AT MAR 2017/27 > To: efloraofindia <indian...@googlegroups.com> > > > Celtis australis > A good quality fodder tree > Near Shimla (H.P.) > April 2016 > Altitude: 1900m > > -- > With best Regards, > > Dr. Anil Kumar Thakur > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to indiantreepi...@googlegroups.com. > > To post to this group, send an email to indian...@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > -- > With regards, > J.M.Garg > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "eFloraofIndia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/8cf095e1-b94b-4150-bf98-7787a58ed23cn%40googlegroups.com.
