Second pic is a different flower - it is not an Impatiens at all. - Tabish
On Oct 28, 11:57 pm, Gurcharan Singh <singh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Resurfacing again for ID > > -- > Dr. Gurcharan Singh > Retired Associate Professor > SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 > Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. > Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Satish Phadke <drsmpha...@gmail.com> > Date: Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 7:22 AM > Subject: [efloraofindia:50428] Plant for ID UP 1 > To: indiantreepix <indiantreepix@googlegroups.com> > > fromushaprabha page <ushaprabhap...@gmail.com> to > indiantreepix@googlegroups.com > date30 September 2010 15:22 subject[efloraofindia:48946] id pl. mailing list > <indiantreepix.googlegroups.com> Filter messages from this mailing list > mailed-bygooglegroups.com Signed bygooglegroups.com unsubscribeUnsubscribe > from this mailing list > hide details 30 Sep (11 days ago) > > Further id of the impatiens in the Eagle nest sanct. > > > > UP2.JPG > 28KViewDownload > > UP1.JPG > 89KViewDownload
