Re: [efloraofindia:61355] Fwd: IMG00049-20101217-0917.jpg

[Gurcharan Singh]

Dear Pudji
It is true that Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat was published by Ramat in
1978. Kitamura in 1978 did not transfer this to genus Dendrathema because,
because if he did he had to retain thespecific epithet morifolium. It was in
fact Tzelev 1961 (in V. L. Komarov, Fl. URSS 26:373) who formed the
combination Dendrathema x morifolium (Ramat) Tzelev, 1961.
      In the same publication Ramat also described Anthemis grandiflora for
which Kitamura in 1978 formed the combination Dendranthema x grandiflora
(Ramat.) Kitam., 1978.

Now there seems to a little confusion. According to GRIN, a fairly respected
database Correct name is *Chrysanthemum x morifolium* Ramat. and following
its synonyms: *Anthemis grandiflora* Ramat.,  *Anthemis stipulacea* Moench,
*Chrysanthemum sinense* Sabine, *Chrysanthemum stipulaceum* (Moench) W.
Wight, *Dendranthema ×grandiflorum* (Ramat.) Kitam. *Dendranthema
×morifolium* (Ramat.) Tzvelev, *Matricaria morifolia* Ramat.

However according to new Plant List published by Kew and Missouri Botanical
Garden (which is supposed to be fairly authentic), all following are
accepted names:

*Chrysanthemum morifolium *Ramat (syn: Anthemis grandiflora Ramat.; *
Matricaria* *morifolia* (Ramat.) Ramat.;
                                *Chrysanthemum stipulaceum* (Moench) W.
Wight, )

*Chrysanthemum x grandiflorum* Ramat. with no recorded synonyms

*Dendranthema ×grandiflorum* (Ramat.) Kitam. with no recorded synonyms (this
is strange because
                                                              basionym has
to be the synonym)

*Dendranthema ×morifolium* (Ramat.) Tzvelev with Tanacetum morifolium
(Ramat.) Kitam as synonym


Sincerely there is lot of confusion out there


-- 
Dr. Gurcharan Singh
Retired  Associate Professor
SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/









On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Pudji Widodo <pudjiuns...@gmail.com> wrote:

> If I am not mistaken
> In 1792 Ramat. published *Chrysanthemum* *morifolium* Ramat. 
> **<http://www.ipni.org/ipni/idPlantNameSearch.do;jsessionid=E4DF28C4FCA683580EDFF1C62A294AAE?id=193606-1&back_page=%2Fipni%2FeditAdvPlantNameSearch.do%3Bjsessionid%3DE4DF28C4FCA683580EDFF1C62A294AAE%3Ffind_infragenus%3D%26find_isAPNIRecord%3Dtrue%26find_geoUnit%3D%26find_includePublicationAuthors%3Dtrue%26find_addedSince%3D%26find_family%3Dasteraceae%26find_genus%3Dchrysanthemum%26find_sortByFamily%3Dtrue%26find_isGCIRecord%3Dtrue%26find_infrafamily%3D%26find_rankToReturn%3Dall%26find_publicationTitle%3D%26find_authorAbbrev%3D%26find_infraspecies%3D%26find_includeBasionymAuthors%3Dtrue%26find_modifiedSince%3D%26find_isIKRecord%3Dtrue%26find_species%3Dmorifolium%26output_format%3Dnormal>in
>  Journ.
> Hist. Nat. Paris ii. 240.  Then in 1978, Kitamura transferred it into 
> **<http://www.ipni.org/ipni/idPlantNameSearch.do?id=201157-1&back_page=%2Fipni%2FeditAdvPlantNameSearch.do%3Ffind_infragenus%3D%26find_isAPNIRecord%3Dtrue%26find_geoUnit%3D%26find_includePublicationAuthors%3Dtrue%26find_addedSince%3D%26find_family%3Dasteraceae%26find_genus%3Ddendranthema%26find_sortByFamily%3Dtrue%26find_isGCIRecord%3Dtrue%26find_infrafamily%3D%26find_rankToReturn%3Dall%26find_publicationTitle%3D%26find_authorAbbrev%3D%26find_infraspecies%3D%26find_includeBasionymAuthors%3Dtrue%26find_modifiedSince%3D%26find_isIKRecord%3Dtrue%26find_species%3Dgrandiflora%26output_format%3Dnormal>
> *Dendranthema* *grandiflora* (Ramat.) Kitam. -- Acta Phytotax. Geobot.
> 29(6): 165
>
> Regards
>
> Pudji Widodo
> Fakultas Biologi Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
> PURWOKERTO 53122 INDONESIA
>
>
>
>