I was mentioning 'Trees of Mumbai' by almeida and Chaturvedi which has ben
published by BNHS in 2006. I was confused by the similarity of title. I
never meant Fernandez's book. I stand by my views on Almeida's work.
ak

On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes
> Each book has its own merits and we should judge them by their respective
> utilities. The same is true of say the Trees of Delhi, which is good for
> common man and even we the botanists for identification, but if we want to
> use it for compiling our eFlora, it may not be of much use as compared to
> Flora of Delhi or other such books. Let us enjoy getting whatever
> information we can . Trees of Mumbai, after all solved our problem of
> Morinda Taxonomy in India.
>
>
> --
>
> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
> Retired  Associate Professor
> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>
> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 2:39 PM, H S <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Anand Ji
>>
>> Please can i know you are talking about which book,,
>> because the work done by R.R. Fernandez is purely taxonomic work
>> compare to others which are for the layman, the book quoted in your
>> statement...
>> Fernandez's book is actually his Ph.D. work (1950)..
>> that time hardly any good cameras were available..... but if you see
>> the plates they are quite good to identify the trees..
>> and this book is nothing to do with BNHS.
>>
>> On 5/30/11, Anand Kumar Bhatt <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Incidentally I have got a copy of the book, and I was really distressed
>> to
>> > see the quality of the photos. Some rank amateur with a cheap camera has
>> > taken the photographs. The camera it seems was purchased by BNHS for
>> this
>> > purpose only. BNHS will be well advised to change the plates in the next
>> > edition if at all there is one. They should hire the services of a
>> > professional. However the work would be for the entire year, so better
>> that
>> > they do it now. The bok is no patch on some other books like Pradeep
>> > Krishan's book on Delhi trees and Shrikant's on Pune trees.
>> > ak
>> >
>> > On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Trees of Mumbai was published in 1999 in which R R Fernandez on page
>> 174
>> >> proposed the combination Morinda coreia var. tomentosa (Hook.f) R R
>> >> Fernandez, ignoring the earliest basonym Heyn ex Roth. Perhaps this
>> >> publication may provide clue to nomenclature of the genus in India. Any
>> >> body
>> >> having access may help.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
>> >> Retired  Associate Professor
>> >> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
>> >> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
>> >> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
>> >> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Anand Kumar Bhatt
>> > A-59, B.S.F.Colony, Airport Road
>> > Gwalior. 474 005.
>> > Tele: 0751-247 2233. Mobile 0 94253 09780.
>> > My blogsite is at:
>> > http://anandkbhatt.blogspot.com
>> > (A NEW BLOG has been ADDED ON 12 April 2011.)
>> > And the photo site:
>> > www.flickr.com/photos/akbhatt/
>> > <http://www.flickr.com/photos/akbhatt/>(NEW PHOTOS HAVE BEEN ADDED ON
>> 15
>> > March 2011.)
>> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> > Ten most  common surnames of Indians: Singh, Kumar, Sharma, Patel, Shah,
>> > Lal, Gupta, Bhat, Rao, Reddy. Cheers!
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>>  - H.S.
>>
>> A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, - a mere heart of
>> stone
>>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Anand Kumar Bhatt
A-59, B.S.F.Colony, Airport Road
Gwalior. 474 005.
Tele: 0751-247 2233. Mobile 0 94253 09780.
My blogsite is at:
http://anandkbhatt.blogspot.com
(A NEW BLOG has been ADDED ON 12 April 2011.)
And the photo site:
www.flickr.com/photos/akbhatt/
<http://www.flickr.com/photos/akbhatt/>(NEW PHOTOS HAVE BEEN ADDED ON 15
March 2011.)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ten most  common surnames of Indians: Singh, Kumar, Sharma, Patel, Shah,
Lal, Gupta, Bhat, Rao, Reddy. Cheers!

Reply via email to