Dear Dr. Gurcharan Singh, Thanks for the clarifications. Points noted. Regards, Mohan
On Jul 24, 6:53 am, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > Mohan ji > For identified plants the minimum information needed is place (locality and > city), altitude if known and habitat (cultivated, roadsides, weed of > cultivation, aquatic, marshy), plus date of photography. These would be be > crucial in final compilation of eFlora. > > -- > Dr. Gurcharan Singh > Retired Associate Professor > SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 > Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. > Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ > > > > On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 10:27 PM, mchunkat <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear Mahadeswara Ji, > > I was going by the brief posting guidelines which states that "No > > restriction of format & number on postings for posting of identified > > plants." Please let me know whether the other details are required for > > identified photographs. The guidelines as given now is likely to be > > misunderstood. > > Regards, > > Mohan > > > On Jul 23, 5:26 pm, Mahadeswara <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Nice catch. It is suggested that the set guidelines be followed > > > while sending the photos for ID / Identified photographs . At lease > > > minimum info. : e.g Location, Place(city) , Date of the photograph > > > taken and field characters if possible. > > > > On Jul 23, 5:10 pm, "Mohan V. Chunkath" <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > Dear Friends, > > > > Goofed up and attached the wrong file earlier. Here is the young > > Bismarckia > > > > nobilis palm photo. Thanks. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Mohan Chunkath > > > > > 5921030505_ddd0838e53_o.jpg > > > > 275KViewDownload
