Dear Manudev, I agree with you that the identification would perfect when we do it based on protologue and monographs.
By the way, It was my mistake that I ided the plant in this thread wrongly and it was not the mistake in any flora. I realized the same when Prabhu pointed out. I apologized for the same. I do not think we have monographs for even 10% of genera in India. And I do not think that we can always go and check the protologues and monographs especially when we get photographs to id. If at all it is necessary, the person who upload has to check and get back because he handled the specimen. It is been happening here. Many of the members are cross checking the id based on expert suggestions. It is a collective effort that we are handling. Further, district flora will give us a clearer picture (provided that the id and the information are correct) about the plants in that region. That mostly reduces the burden of going through long keys (at least for new comers) wherein the key would be for a broader region (eg. Gamble, Presidency of Madrass, covers almost the whole peninsular India and some of the keys are too complicated to handle, especially for a layman or a newcomer). I suggest experts to write the concerned author and the publisher, of whatever publication, pointing out the mistakes. I hope you have done the same for what you found with Arisaema. I use to do so. Regards, Giby On 31 October 2011 12:18, manudev madhavan <[email protected]>wrote: > Dear all, > > A humble suggestion from my side.. > Whenever we make a comment on the identity of a plant, I request to > you to check the characters of the plants with the protologue. I have > seen many floras give wrong identifications and misleading > descriptions. Can you imagine a a wrong identification even in a > monograph?? Myself has encountered such a situation recently in an > Arisaema revision. Such mistakes can carry forward easily. Almost all > the Kerala floras have followed this wrong ID in their treatment of > the genus. I agree many times we may not able to check the protologues > but we can select most reliable works. > I would suggest you people to refer monographs or family revisions > rather than district floras for the confirmation of the ID. Since the > mistakes are even found in such monographs and revisions, it would be > much better if it is the original description or type illustration > of the plant. I think accessing a protologue is not a himalayan in > this era > > with warm regards > > On Oct 25, 9:32 am, Giby Kuriakose <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have written to few people whose id is misleading referring this thread > > and few other relevant online references. > > > > Thanks and Regards, > > Giby. > > > > On 24 October 2011 18:56, Dinesh Valke <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes Prejith ji ... I am one of the contributors in misleading !! > > > Some of pictures in my photostream need to be rectified. > > > Will revisit them shortly. > > > > > Giby ji was kind enough to at least two instances. > > > > > Regards. > > > Dinesh > > > > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 6:28 PM, PreSam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> Thanks to everybody for the identification. A lot of pictures of > > >> Murdannia pauciflora on the internet are misleading. > > > > >> Regards, > > >> Prejith. > > > > >> On Oct 24, 11:07 am, Giby Kuriakose <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > I am very sorry for a mistake from my side as I have taken notes > wrongly > > >> on > > >> > to my notebook and my identification of plant in this thread went > wrong. > > >> I > > >> > do not know how it had happened. > > >> > Thank you Prabhu for pointing out that and made me to recheck the > same. > > > > >> > Yes this is *M. pauciflora* only. > > > > >> > I further agree with Mayur jis explanation on *M. languinosa. * > > > > >> > *Murdania pauciflora* > > > > >> > ....stem creeping rooting at nodes, villous on one side. Leaves up > to 5X > > >> > 1.6cm sessile base usually cordate; more or less hairy, sheaths with > > >> ciliate > > >> > margins > > >> > Flowers in 1-5 flowered, axillary cymes. Sepals narrowely oblong > petals > > >> > brownish yellow > > >> > Stamens and staminodes 3 each..... (Flora of Udupi, G K Bhat) > > > > >> > Thanks and Regards > > >> > Giby > > > > >> > On 24 October 2011 08:53, Mayur Nandikar <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > > > >> > > Dear all................. > > >> > > Prabhu ji is may be right and again I am writing here flowers in > > >> *Murdannia > > >> > > pauciflora *are orange to brick red in colour. > > >> > > * > > >> > > * > > >> > > In *Murdannia lanuginosa *leaves are linear to linear lanceolate > with > > >> a > > >> > > broad base, finely acuminate apex, conspicuously striate and with > > >> acuminate > > >> > > margin. Grow always erect. > > > > >> > > Above posted plant is may be *M. pauciflora *coz of its prostrate > > >> habit > > >> > > (apparently look likes), leaves ovate, apex acute, and margins > aren't > > >> that > > >> > > much of undulate. > > > > >> > > To compare herewith I am attaching image of *M. lanuginosa * > > > > >> > > * * > > > > >> > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Satish Phadke < > [email protected] > > >> >wrote: > > > > >> > >> *Murdannia lanuginosa* > > >> > >> A common plant at Kaas in Sep. > > > > >> > >> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Prejith Sampath < > [email protected] > > >> >wrote: > > > > >> > >>> This is a plant found growing on the roadsides in South Wynad at > > >> about > > >> > >>> 700 to 800 msl. Is it a Commelina sp. ? > > > > >> > >>> Regards, > > >> > >>> Prejith > > > > >> > >> -- > > >> > >> Dr Satish Phadke > > > > >> > > -- > > >> > > Mr. Mayur D. Nandikar, > > >> > > Research Student, > > >> > > Department of Botany, > > >> > > Shivaji University, > > >> > > Kolhapur. > > >> > > 07507013607 > > > > >> > -- > > >> > GIBY KURIAKOSE PhD > > >> > Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE), > > >> > Royal Enclave, > > >> > Jakkur Post, Srirampura > > >> > Bangalore- 560064 > > >> > India > > >> > Phone - +91 9448714856 (Mobile) > > >> > visit my pictures @http://www.flickr.com/photos/giby > > > > -- > > GIBY KURIAKOSE PhD > > Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE), > > Royal Enclave, > > Jakkur Post, Srirampura > > Bangalore- 560064 > > India > > Phone - +91 9448714856 (Mobile) > > visit my pictures @http://www.flickr.com/photos/giby > -- GIBY KURIAKOSE PhD Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE), Royal Enclave, Jakkur Post, Srirampura Bangalore- 560064 India Phone - +91 9448714856 (Mobile) visit my pictures @ http://www.flickr.com/photos/giby
