Agreed Dinesh I was also apprehensive about the 4th point. Thanks for making is more clear to discard this option.
-- Dr. Gurcharan Singh Retired Associate Professor SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/ http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Dinesh Valke <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes Gurcharan ji, each member to post as per his / her ease. > > Your 4th point > - Resizing an image to look like a thumbnail would perhaps dissolve the > purpose - it would involve downloading the image to view it in large size. > Best would be to keep the size of picture as it is. > > To me width of picture ranging anywhere between 500 - 1024 pixels is good > > Regards. > Dinesh > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Yes Dinesh ji >> One thing is sure, Convolvulaceae week is on from coming Monday. >> We will give multiple options to members so that some not conversant with >> technology don't get discouraged. >> >> 1. Preferred option would be Sharing google docs with option of pasting >> the image s in the mail. Person can have all his images in same mail. This >> way, however, the mail would be much longer and members would have to >> scroll down to see images (it will, however save the botheration of >> clicking the attachment or individual icons as earlier). >> 2. Allowing members to simply send doc as email. It will be simpler, and >> single click to attachment will open the file with all attachments. But no >> icons or images would be visible in the mail. >> 3. Allowing the older option where poster will upload one (or two) images >> less than 100 kb in first mail and add more images in subsequent mails in >> the same thread. >> 4. I have also tried another option in the last mail. reduce the image >> size to an icon after inserting. This way icons would be visible in the >> mail, and size on saving remains same, but there is no direct way of >> viewing the full image. >> >> Your views on this please. >> >> >> -- >> Dr. Gurcharan Singh >> Retired Associate Professor >> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 >> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. >> Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 >> http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/ >> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ >> >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Dinesh Valke <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Gurcharan ji, for the coming week of Convolvulaceae, and other posts at >>> eFI, this approach seems good to go, until any better solution comes up. >>> Thoughts of everyone are welcome. >>> >>> Regards. >>> Dinesh >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Yes Dinesh although the image size acceptable in Google docs is 2000 x >>>> 2000 pixels, and it gets reduced to lower resolution as it reaches you but >>>> still the fact that it allows you to attach multiple images (of capped 2000 >>>> x 2000), gives us added advantage and worth a try. >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh >>>> Retired Associate Professor >>>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 >>>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. >>>> Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 >>>> http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/ >>>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Dinesh Valke >>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> OK Surajit ji. >>>>> Laying out, beautifying it, etc is all best left to the author of the >>>>> doc. >>>>> >>>>> Let us see wait to know if this approach is OK for all. >>>>> OR wait to know any difficulties faced by other members. >>>>> >>>>> Regards. >>>>> Dinesh >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 12:44 PM, surajit koley < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Yes, Sir, it was a test doc., thought A4 would suffice for 800x600. >>>>>> Will change the page to A3 next time. >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Surajit >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Dinesh Valke <[email protected] >>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Surajit ji, >>>>>>> Try changing the page size to A3 via File > Page setup... ... IF you >>>>>>> wish to insert pictures larger than 640 px width. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards. >>>>>>> Dinesh >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 12:37 PM, surajit koley (Google Docs) < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I've shared Argemone mexicana :: 2012-03-08 :: Hooghly (WB) >>>>>>>> SK<https://docs.google.com/document/d/13TtD-0AzRFMT8iDaUSrhN14JHIG_H2aevJwsVZ6YdxE/edit> >>>>>>>> Click to open: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Argemone mexicana :: 2012-03-08 :: Hooghly (WB) >>>>>>>> SK<https://docs.google.com/document/d/13TtD-0AzRFMT8iDaUSrhN14JHIG_H2aevJwsVZ6YdxE/edit> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sir, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sharing images of Argemone mexicana that was once very common on >>>>>>>> village roadside, but is hard to find one these days. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Species : Argemone mexicana L. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Type : wild herb >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Date : 06-March-2012, 2.16 p.m. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Place : Hooghly, West Bengal >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ID help : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argemone_mexicana >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Surajit Koley >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> more images :- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> another image :- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Google Docs makes it easy to create, store and share online >>>>>>>> documents, spreadsheets and presentations. >>>>>>>> [image: Logo for Google Docs] <https://docs.google.com> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> >
