Pankaj ji, I think some error has happened in attaching files. The second
batch of pictures are of Scleichera oleosa, I think.

Regards

Vijayasankar Raman
National Center for Natural Products Research
University of Mississippi


On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 1:47 PM, surajit koley <
surajitnotavaila...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Sir,
>
> Very strange! These new leaves don't have any petiole!
>
> Regards,
>
> Surajit
>
> On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 12:06 AM, Pankaj Oudhia <pankajoud...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Some more pictures of Bahera leaves during rainy season.
>>
>> http://ecoport.org/ep?SearchType=pdb&PdbID=104274
>>
>> http://ecoport.org/ep?SearchType=pdb&PdbID=104275
>>
>> regards
>>
>> Pankaj Oudhia
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:59 PM, surajit koley <
>> surajitnotavaila...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Wonderful shots Sir, all of them, this one
>>> http://ecoport.org/ep?SearchType=pdb&PdbID=70392 is superb.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> surajit
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Pankaj Oudhia 
>>> <pankajoud...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Some pictures with close view of Bahera with new red leaves.
>>>>
>>>> http://ecoport.org/ep?SearchType=pdb&PdbID=70399
>>>>
>>>> http://ecoport.org/ep?SearchType=pdb&PdbID=70392
>>>>
>>>> http://ecoport.org/ep?SearchType=pdb&PdbID=70414
>>>>
>>>> regards
>>>>
>>>> Pankaj Oudhia
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:51 PM, surajit koley <
>>>> surajitnotavaila...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Sir,
>>>>> It's getting more and more complicated... but one thing is for sure -
>>>>> the post wins :)
>>>>>  Thank you very much.
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> surajit
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Pankaj Oudhia <
>>>>> pankajoud...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Glands absent."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Flora of Madhya Pradesh by BSI confirms the quote of Vijayashankar ji.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Pankaj Oudhia
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 9:38 PM, Vijayasankar <
>>>>>> vijay.botan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pl don't worry Satish ji. Surajit ji can't do that :) beacuse T.
>>>>>>> bellirica is perhaps the only species (in India at least) that do not 
>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>> foliar glands. Sorry to disappoint you :)
>>>>>>> However, the posted pictures are of *Terminalia bellirica* as
>>>>>>> identified by Dr. Neil. We have observed variations in the size and 
>>>>>>> shape
>>>>>>> of leaves as well as fruits in this species.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Vijayasankar Raman
>>>>>>> National Center for Natural Products Research
>>>>>>> University of Mississippi
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Satish Phadke <
>>>>>>> drsmpha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Surajit ji
>>>>>>>> May I request you one thing. Try to capture the glands at the base
>>>>>>>> of mature leaf. I am sure you will do that.
>>>>>>>> Unfortunately I don't have good photograph of these.
>>>>>>>> I recently learnt that every Terminalia has unique gland structure.
>>>>>>>> Why not have good photographs of each?
>>>>>>>> This request is even to other members.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:15 PM, surajit koley <
>>>>>>>> surajitnotavaila...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dear Neil Sir & Pankaj Sir,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Good evening...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I am now convinced that the plant/tree is *T. bellirica* as have
>>>>>>>>> been identified by you. Initially i was hesitant because -
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1) because of the description of 2.15 cm long leaf-stalk as in -
>>>>>>>>> http://www.flowersofindia.net/catalog/slides/Baheda.html
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2) in my images all leaves originate from the apex of the shoot,
>>>>>>>>> whereas your imges at -
>>>>>>>>> http://www.discoverlife.org/mp/20p?see=I_PAO1999&res=640 and at -
>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!searchin/indiantreepix/Terminalia$20Neil$20Soares/indiantreepix/3xFtSa7jWFo/rq4suJX2k-IJ
>>>>>>>>> show alternate leaves. Most other images available in the net also 
>>>>>>>>> tally
>>>>>>>>> with both of you.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> However, after more search found my target at -
>>>>>>>>> http://ayurvedaelements.com/resources/spice/Terminalia%20belerica.png?timestamp=1266630963601.
>>>>>>>>>  Moreover, wiki says, "Two varieties of
>>>>>>>>> *T. belerica* are found in India..." -
>>>>>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terminalia_bellirica.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for giving me your valuable time and
>>>>>>>>> identifying this tree. I cannot express my gratitude in terms of 
>>>>>>>>> words only.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Surajit
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Neil Soares <
>>>>>>>>> drneilsoa...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Nice photograph Dr. Oudhia. To view my photograph please type '
>>>>>>>>>> Terminalia bellirica Neil Soares' in the Mail Search box above and 
>>>>>>>>>> check my
>>>>>>>>>> mail dated 15th April 2011.
>>>>>>>>>>                   With regards,
>>>>>>>>>>                     Neil Soares.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --- On *Thu, 4/19/12, Pankaj Oudhia <pankajoud...@gmail.com>*wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> From: Pankaj Oudhia <pankajoud...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:113771] roadside tree ID from Hooghly
>>>>>>>>>> 19-04-12 SK-2
>>>>>>>>>> To: "Neil Soares" <drneilsoa...@yahoo.com>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: "surajit koley" <surajitnotavaila...@gmail.com>, "Tanay
>>>>>>>>>> Bose" <tanaybos...@gmail.com>, indiantreepix@googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>>>> Date: Thursday, April 19, 2012, 12:04 PM
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> My picture of Baheda (Terminalia bellirica) for comparison
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.discoverlife.org/mp/20p?see=I_PAO1999&res=640
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> regards
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Pankaj Oudhia
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Neil Soares <
>>>>>>>>>> drneilsoa...@yahoo.com<http://us.mc339.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=drneilsoa...@yahoo.com>
>>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>   Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>  Have many of these trees on my property at Shahpur. Please also
>>>>>>>>>> check my photographs of this which are in the archives of this group.
>>>>>>>>>>                    With regards,
>>>>>>>>>>                     Neil Soares.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --- On *Thu, 4/19/12, surajit koley <
>>>>>>>>>> surajitnotavaila...@gmail.com<http://us.mc339.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=surajitnotavaila...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> >* wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> From: surajit koley 
>>>>>>>>>> <surajitnotavaila...@gmail.com<http://us.mc339.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=surajitnotavaila...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:113745] roadside tree ID from Hooghly
>>>>>>>>>> 19-04-12 SK-2
>>>>>>>>>> To: "Neil Soares" 
>>>>>>>>>> <drneilsoa...@yahoo.com<http://us.mc339.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=drneilsoa...@yahoo.com>
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: "Tanay Bose" 
>>>>>>>>>> <tanaybos...@gmail.com<http://us.mc339.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=tanaybos...@gmail.com>>,
>>>>>>>>>> indiantreepix@googlegroups.com<http://us.mc339.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=indiantreepix@googlegroups.com>
>>>>>>>>>> Date: Thursday, April 19, 2012, 8:33 AM
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Good morning Sir and thank you.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But the leaf stalk is much longer in my post than this
>>>>>>>>>> description "Leaves are 8-20 cm long, 7.5-15 cm wide, on stalks 2.15 
>>>>>>>>>> cm
>>>>>>>>>> long...." at
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.flowersofindia.net/catalog/slides/Baheda.html.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Have a nice day Sir....
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Surajit
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Neil Soares <
>>>>>>>>>> drneilsoa...@yahoo.com<http://us.mc339.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=drneilsoa...@yahoo.com>
>>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>   Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>  This looks like Beheda [Terminalia bellirica].
>>>>>>>>>>                With regards,
>>>>>>>>>>                  Neil Soares.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Dr Satish Phadke
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to