Thanks Garg Ji for reconsideration, thanks satish Ji and Radha Ji for nice feedback...
On 6/17/12, radhaveach <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, this doesn't seem to be Ehretia laevis because the fruits are not > 2-lobed. Likely to be Ehretia aspera. > Great clear photos. > > regards, > > Radha Veach > > On Wednesday, June 6, 2012 9:08:03 PM UTC+5:30, Satish Phadke wrote: >> >> Very nice crisp photographs. >> The leaves do not appear glabrous. I think this is *Ehretia aspera*. Let >> us wait for opinion of others. >> >> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:16 AM, ushadi Micromini < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> what a nice complete set of pictures >>> usha di >>> = >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Nidhan Singh >>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Dear All, >>>> >>>> This is *Ehretia laevis** Roxb., Pl. Corom. 1: 42, t. 56, 1795*; >>>> Collett, Fl. Simlensis 330. >>>> >>>> A moderate-sized, deciduous tree with smooth, grey bark. Leaves 7-14 cm >>>> >>>> long, elliptic, obtuse or acuminate, entire, membraneous when young, >>>> hard >>>> when mature. Flowers white, small, in terminal or axillary, slender, >>>> usually one-sided cymes. Calyx 5-cleft. Corolla-tube 2.5 cm long, petals >>>> 5, >>>> spreading. Stamens 5. Fruit a 0.5 cm across drupe, globose, depressed, >>>> red. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Dr. Nidhan Singh >>>> Department of Botany >>>> I.B. (PG) College >>>> Panipat-132103 Haryana >>>> Ph.: 09416371227 >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Usha di >>> =========== >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Dr Satish Phadke >> > -- Regards, Dr. Nidhan Singh Department of Botany I.B. (PG) College Panipat-132103 Haryana Ph.: 09416371227
