'..both FoM & FBI mention it, though the former calls it puberulous and the 
latter hispid...'

Please read as:

..both FoM & FBI mention it, though the latter calls it puberulous and the 
former hispid.



On Sunday, July 8, 2012 10:31:49 PM UTC+5:30, Samir Mehta wrote:
>
> That's one of the things I considered Rajesh ji,but according to the keys 
> Maytenus 
> senegalensis is an 'armed' plant plus what really was decisive was the hair 
> on the veins below, both FoM & FBI mention it, though the former calls it 
> puberulous and the latter hispid. 
> I will also like to point out that certain features [in this case - hair 
> on the leaf under-surface] are missed in the field & appreciated only on 
> post-processing. My field id was Maytenus sp.
>
> I am still open to correction provided a logical reason is given.
>
> Trust that answers your query.
>
> Regards,
>
> Samir Mehta
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sunday, July 8, 2012 9:19:04 PM UTC+5:30, Rajesh Sachdev wrote:
>>
>> Dr Mahta,
>> Why not Maytenus senegalensis ?
>>
>> On 8 July 2012 20:20, Samir Mehta <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Fellow Group-Members,
>>>
>>> Got a chance to go to Prabalgad with a trekking group, had wanted to go 
>>> there for a long time, after seeing Prasant ji's posts from that area. As 
>>> was to be expected, it was more of a trek than a flower watching trip - and 
>>> a difficult one too.
>>>
>>> Spotted this large unarmed shrub just short of Prabal machi, about ? 
>>> 1000 ft asl, the lower surface of the leaf had hairs on the veins (cannot 
>>> remember whether they were hispid or puberulous); flower size was 
>>> approx.1cm.
>>>
>>> There seems to be some confusion in the taxonomic nomenclature 
>>> (unresolved in the plant list and not listed at ARS-GRIN and FoC or Fl 
>>> Pakistan). 
>>> The id is based on Fl. Maharashtra 1:241 & 243, but here flowering 
>>> season is given as Dec-Jan, needs to be checked and FBI 1:619.
>>> The shrub is not listed in Shrikant ji's Flowers of Sahyadri or Further 
>>> Flowers 
>>> of Sahyadri and no image of it was available for comparison in the 
>>> group database or on the net.
>>>
>>> Will appreciate if this post can be validated.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Regards
>> Rajesh Sachdev
>> http://project-matheran.webs.com
>> https://www.facebook.com/leopardguy
>>
>>
>>
>>  

Reply via email to