That's great, Satish ji.
Can we now have a check list in excel made out of this, with species
arranged alphabetically ?

On 22 September 2012 11:46, Satish Phadke <[email protected]> wrote:

> Many thanks for all the participants for the overwhelming response to the
> recently concluded : *VOF MONTH*.
> Please pardon me for not responding to many threads last few days as I was
> busy in compiling the statistics of the species discussed.
> 1)I have prepared an excel sheet with family-wise distribution of the
> plants studied. There might be some duplication of few species due to
> synonyms and at the same time I have tried to exclude the planted garden
> species posted as far as possible which are not endemic.
> 2) I have more than 1200 mails carrying label VOF in my inbox(*1212* to
> be precise at this moment)
> 3)Total number of species discussed comes to *470 approx*.(Because there
> might be some duplication or non-inclusion due to personal errors)including
> fern and Marchantia. One species of moss posted has not been counted by me.
> 4)There are* 88 families* representing the plants posted including fern
> and Marchantia. The nomenclature of some families has changed so again
> there might be some overlap and may be interpreted differently by some. esp
> family Caprifoliaceae which is now subdivided into several small families.
> 5)The largest family by number of species discussed is *Asteraceae with 54
> * species discussed during the episode.
> 6)Next largest is Family: Rosaceae with 40 sp. discussed which is followed
> by Polygonaceae 23. Lamiaceae 21. Orchidaceae 20. Scrophulariaceae 18.
> Fabaceae 17. Ranunculaceae 16. Caryophyllaceae 12 Saxifragaceae and
> Balsaminaceae with 9 sp.each.
> 7)Some surprises(to me) Betulaceae which includes the famous Betula utilis
> tree also has occurrence in the valley with 5 more species recorded in our
> database.
> 8)Some major families with significant occurrence elsewhere were
> promonently absent here. Some of them are :Bignoniaceae;
> Capparidaceae,Combretaceae, Sapotaceae; Sterculiaceae and Tiliaceae.
> Please feel free to point any errors or important mentioning in the
> statistics which might have escaped my attention.
> Dr Satish Phadke
>
> --
>
>
>
>



-- 
With regards,
J.M.Garg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1
'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna'
The whole world uses my Image Resource of more than a *thousand species* &
eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc. (arranged
alphabetically & place-wise):
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg. You can also use them
for free as per Creative Commons license attached with each image.
For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian Flora,
please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google e-group:
http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix (more than 1950 members &
1,27,800 messages on 31/8/12) or Efloraofindia website:
https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/ (with a species database
of more than 7000 species).
Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common Birds of
India'.

-- 



Reply via email to