On 08/18/2010 03:00 PM, Pravin Satpute wrote: > I just talked with person who started this survey, the idea is to not > reveal who is conducting the survey. This must be done in order to > reduce "origin bias" most surveys from.
That is indeed a bit strange. A survey of this kind should ideally provide links to : - the reasoning behind the options provided - a contact address if someone decides to ask more questions > so i leave it to participants either they are interesting in completing > this or not. If the viewers of the URL to the survey are not interested in completing it, would it not be counter productive. You say that you talked with the person who is conducting the survey. In effect, you may have already had a discussion about the priority order of the choices. I am not attempting to nit-pick, but the manner in which the survey is presented with an anonymous owner does not generate confidence that it would be made available to the DIT/MinIT etc. -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <http://sankarshan.randomink.org/blog/> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev _______________________________________________ IndLinux-group mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/indlinux-group
